My Principal

Planets Facts and Figures

Jupiter Facts and Figures

Equatorial radius
71,490 km

Equatorial inclination
3.13°

Mass
1.90×1027 kg

Average density
1.3 g/cm3

Rotational period
0.414 days

Orbital period
11.86 years

Average distance from the Sun
778.4 million km

Perihelion
740.3 million km

Aphelion
816.4 million km

Orbital eccentricity
0.0489

Orbital inclination
1.30°

Moons
39

Source
Data are from the U.S. Naval Observatory's annual Astronomical Almanac and various other publications.



Earth Facts and Figures

Equatorial radius
6,378 km

Equatorial inclination
23.5°

Mass
5.97×1024 kg

Average density
5.5 g/cm3

Rotational period
0.997 days

Orbital period
1 year

Average distance from the Sun
149.6 million km

Perihelion
147.1 million km

Aphelion
152.1 million km

Orbital eccentricity
0.0167

Orbital inclination
0.0003°

Moons
1

Source
Data are from the U.S. Naval Observatory's annual Astronomical Almanac and various other publications.


Mars Facts and Figures

Equatorial radius
3,396 km

Equatorial inclination
25.2°

Mass
6.42×1023 kg

Average density
3.9 g/cm3

Rotational period
1.03 days

Orbital period
1.881 years

Average distance from the Sun
228 million km

Perihelion
206.7 million km

Aphelion
249.3 million km

Orbital eccentricity
0.0935

Orbital inclination
1.85°

Moons
2

Source
Data are from the U.S. Naval Observatory's annual Astronomical Almanac and various other publications.


Neptune Facts and Figures

Equatorial radius
24,760 km

Equatorial inclination
28.3°

Mass
1.02×1026 kg

Average density
1.6 g/cm3

Rotational period
0.671 days

Orbital period
164.8 years

Average distance from the Sun
4.488 billion kilometers

Perihelion
4.440 billion kilometers

Aphelion
4.536 billion kilometers

Orbital eccentricity
0.00995

Orbital inclination
1.77°

Moons
8

Source
Data are from the U.S. Naval Observatory's annual Astronomical Almanac and various other publications.

Mercury Facts and Figures

Equatorial radius
2,440 km

Equatorial inclination
0.01°

Mass
3.30×1023 kg

Average density
5.4 g/cm3

Rotational period
58.6 days

Orbital period
0.2408 years

Average distance from the Sun
57.91 million km

Perihelion
46 million km

Aphelion
69.82 million km

Orbital eccentricity
0.206

Orbital inclination


Moons
0

Source
Data are from the U.S. Naval Observatory's annual Astronomical Almanac and various other publications.

Venus Facts and Figures

Equatorial radius
6,052 km

Equatorial inclination
2.64°

Mass
4.87×1024 kg

Average density
5.2 g/cm3

Rotational period1
-240 days

Orbital period
0.6152 years

Average distance from the Sun
108.2 million km

Perihelion
107.5 million km

Aphelion
108.9 million km

Orbital eccentricity
0.00674

Orbital inclination
3.39°

Moons
0

Source
Data are from the U.S. Naval Observatory's annual Astronomical Almanac and various other publications.

Footnotes
1A negative rotational period indicates that Venus rotates in the opposite direction from that in which Earth and most of the other planets rotate.

Pluto Facts and Figures

Equatorial radius
1,195 km

Equatorial inclination
57.4°

Mass
1.40×1022 kg

Average density
1.8 g/cm3

Rotational period1
-6.4 days

Orbital period
247.9 years

Average distance from the Sun
5.879 billion kilometers

Perihelion
4.431 billion kilometers

Aphelion
7.327 billion kilometers

Orbital eccentricity
0.248

Orbital inclination
17.2°

Moons
1

Source
Data are from the U.S. Naval Observatory's annual Astronomical Almanac and various other publications.

Footnotes
1A negative rotational period indicates that Pluto rotates in the opposite direction from that in which Earth and most of the other planets rotate.

Saturn Facts and Figures

Equatorial radius
60,270 km

Equatorial inclination
26.7°

Mass
5.69×1026 kg

Average density
0.69 g/cm3

Rotational period
0.444 days

Orbital period
29.46 years

Average distance from the Sun
1.435 billion kilometers

Perihelion
1.352 billion kilometers

Aphelion
1.517 billion kilometers

Orbital eccentricity
0.0576

Orbital inclination
2.49°

Moons
32

Source
Data are from the U.S. Naval Observatory's annual Astronomical Almanac and various other publications.








Uranus Facts and Figures

Equatorial radius
25,560 km

Equatorial inclination
82.2°

Mass
8.68×1025 kg

Average density
1.3 g/cm3

Rotational period1
-0.718 days

Orbital period
84.01 years

Average distance from the Sun
2.857 billion kilometers

Perihelion
2.719 billion kilometers

Aphelion
2.996 billion kilometers

Orbital eccentricity
0.0497

Orbital inclination
0.772°

Moons
27

Source
Data are from the U.S. Naval Observatory's annual Astronomical Almanac and various other publications.

Footnotes
1A negative rotational period indicates that Uranus rotates in the opposite direction from that in which Earth and most of the other planets rotate.

India Facts and Figures

Basic Facts

Official name
Republic of India

Capital
New Delhi

Area
3,165,596 sq km

1,222,243 sq mi



People
Population
1,065,070,600 (2004 estimate)

Population growth
Population growth rate
1.44 percent (2004 estimate)


Projected population in 2025
1,361,625,090 (2004 estimate)


Projected population in 2050
1,601,004,572 (2004 estimate)



Population density
358 persons per sq km (2004 estimate)

928 persons per sq mi (2004 estimate)



Urban/rural distribution
Share urban
28 percent (2002 estimate)


Share rural
72 percent (2002 estimate)



Largest cities, with population
Kolkata (Calcutta)
13,216,546 (2001)


Delhi
12,791,458 (2001)


Mumbai (Bombay)
11,914,398 (2001)


Chennai (Madras)
6,424,624 (2001)


Hyderābād
5,533,640 (2001)



Ethnic groups
Indo-Aryan
72 percent


Dravidian
25 percent


Other
3 percent



Languages
There are 24 languages spoken in India by at least 1 million people each. Numerous other languages and dialects are also spoken. Hindi is the official national language and is the primary language for 40 percent of the population. Other official languages include Assamese, Bangla, Gujarati, Kannada, Kashmiri, Konkani, Malayalam, Manipuri, Marathi, Nepali, Oriya, Punjabi, Sanskrit, Sindhi, Tamil, Telugu, and Urdu. Hindustani is a popular variant of Hindi/Urdu and is spoken widely throughout northern India. English has associate status as the official working language and is important for national, political, and commercial matters.

Hindi
40 percent


Bengali
8 percent


Telugu
8 percent


Marathi
7 percent


Tamil
6 percent


Urdu
5 percent


Gujarati
5 percent


Kannada
4 percent


Malayalam
4 percent


Oriya
3 percent


Punjabi
3 percent


Assamese
2 percent


Other
5 percent



Religious affiliations
Hindu
75 percent


Muslim
12 percent


Christian
6 percent


Sikh
2 percent


Buddhist
1 percent


Nonreligious
1 percent


Other
3 percent



Health and Education
Life expectancy
Total
64 years (2004 estimate)


Female
64.8 years (2004 estimate)


Male
63.2 years (2004 estimate)



Infant mortality rate
58 deaths per 1,000 live births (2004 estimate)

Population per physician
2,462 people (1993)

Population per hospital bed
1,271 people (1991)

Literacy rate
Total
56 percent (2004 estimate)


Female
42.2 percent (2004 estimate)


Male
68.9 percent (2004 estimate)



Education expenditure as a share of gross national product (GNP)
2.9 percent (1999-2000)

Number of years of compulsory schooling
8 years (1998)

Number of students per teacher, primary school
43 students per teacher (1999-2000)

Government
Form of government
Federal republic

Head of state
President

Head of government
Prime minister

Legislature
Bicameral legislature

Lok Sabha (House of the People): 545 members



Rajya Sabha (Council of States): 245 members



Voting qualifications
Universal at age 18

Constitution
26 January 1950

Highest court
Supreme Court

Armed forces
Army, Navy, Air Force
Total number of military personnel
1,325,000 (2002)


Military expenditures as a share of gross domestic product (GDP)
2.7 percent (2002)



First-level political divisions
28 states and 7 union territories

Economy
Gross domestic product (GDP, in U.S.$)
$510.2 billion (2002)

GDP per capita (U.S.$)
$490 (2002)

GDP by economic sector
Agriculture, forestry, fishing
22.7 percent (2002)


Industry
26.6 percent (2002)


Services
50.7 percent (2002)



Employment
Number of workers
470,210,620 (2002)


Workforce share of economic sector
Agriculture, forestry, fishing
67 percent (1995)


Industry
13 percent (1995)


Services
20 percent (1995)



Unemployment rate
Not available



National budget (U.S.$)
Total revenue
$62,906 million (2001)


Total expenditure
$83,775 million (2001)



Monetary unit
1 Indian rupee (Re), consisting of 100 paise


Agriculture
Sugarcane, rice, wheat, tea, cotton, jute, vegetables, melons, sorghum, millet, cashews, coffee, spices, livestock


Mining
Iron ore, coal, bauxite, manganese, mica, dolomite, copper, petroleum, natural gas, chromium, lead, limestone, phosphate rock, zinc, gold, silver


Manufacturing
Textiles, iron and steel, processed agricultural products, machinery, transportation equipment, nonferrous metals, fertilizer, refined petroleum, chemicals, computer software


Major exports
Gems and jewelry, engineering goods, garments, chemicals and pharmaceuticals, cotton yarn and fabrics, leather and leather goods, marine products, iron ore, tea, vegetables and fruit, petroleum products, handmade carpets


Major imports
Petroleum and petroleum products, nonelectric machinery, precious and semiprecious stones, inorganic chemicals, iron and steel, fertilizers, electrical machinery, resins and plastics


Major trade partners for exports
United States, United Kingdom, Hong Kong SAR, Germany, and Japan


Major trade partners for imports
United States, Singapore, Belgium, United Kingdom, and Germany


Energy, Communications, and Transportation
Electricity production
Electricity from thermal sources
81.72 percent (2001 estimate)


Electricity from hydroelectric sources
14.52 percent (2001 estimate)


Electricity from nuclear sources
3.42 percent (2001 estimate)


Electricity from geothermal, solar, and wind sources
0.35 percent (2001 estimate)



Number of radios per 1,000 people
120 (1997)

Number of telephones per 1,000 people
40 (2002)

Number of televisions per 1,000 people
77 (2000 estimate)

Number of Internet hosts per 10,000 people
0.75 (2002)

Daily newspaper circulation per 1,000 people
60 (1998)

Number of motor vehicles per 1,000 people
0.1 (1998)

Paved road as a share of total roads
46 percent (1999)

Sources
Basic Facts and People sections
Area data are from the statistical bureaus of individual countries. Population, population growth rate, and population projections are from the United States Census Bureau, International Programs Center, International Data Base (IDB) (www.census.gov). Urban and rural population data are from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations (UN), FAOSTAT database (www.fao.org). Largest cities population data and political divisions data are from the statistical bureaus of individual countries. Ethnic divisions and religion data are largely from the latest Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) World Factbook and from various country censuses and reports. Language data are largely from the Ethnologue, Languages of the World, Summer Institute of Linguistics International (www.sil.org).


Health and Education section
Life expectancy and infant mortality data are from the United States Census Bureau, International Programs Center, International database (IDB) (www.census.gov). Population per physician and population per hospital bed data are from the World Health Organization (WHO) (www.who.int). Education data are from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) database (www.unesco.org).


Government section
Government, independence, legislature, constitution, highest court, and voting qualifications data are largely from various government Web sites, the latest Europa World Yearbook, and the latest Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) World Factbook. The armed forces data is from Military Balance.


Economy section
Gross domestic product (GDP), GDP per capita, GDP by economic sectors, employment, and national budget data are from the World Bank database (www.worldbank.org). Monetary unit, agriculture, mining, manufacturing, exports, imports, and major trade partner information is from the statistical bureaus of individual countries, latest Europa World Yearbook, and various United Nations and International Monetary Fund (IMF) publications.


Energy, Communication, and Transportation section
Electricity information is from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) database (www.eia.doe.gov). Radio, telephone, television, and newspaper information is from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) database (www.unesco.org). Internet hosts, motor vehicles, and road data are from the World Bank database (www.worldbank.org).


Note
Figures may not total 100 percent due to rounding.

Largest U.S. Libraries
Institution
Volumes Held

Library of Congress
24.6 million (volumes)
Harvard University
14.4 million(Volumes)
Chicago Public Library
11.0 million
New York Public Library
10.6 million
Yale University
10.5 million
Queens Borough Public Library
10.4 million
Cincinnati and Hamilton County Public Library
10.0 million
University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana
9.5 million
University of California, Berkeley
9.1 million
Los Angeles Public Library, County of
8.3 million
King County Library System
8.1 million
University of Texas, Austin
7.9 million
Boston Public Library
7.7 million
University of California, Los Angeles
7.5 million
University of Michigan
7.3 million
Stanford University
7.3 million
Columbia University
7.3 million
Brooklyn Public Library
7.2 million
Cornell University
6.6 million
University of Chicago
6.6 million
Indiana University
6.3 million
Free Library of Philadelphia
6.2 million
University of Wisconsin, Madison
6.1 million
University of Washington
6.1 million
Los Angeles Public Library
6.0 million
Princeton University
5.9 million
University of Minnesota
5.9 million
Ohio State University
5.4 million
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
5.1 million
San Diego Public Library
5.0 million
Duke University
5.0 million
University of Pennsylvania
5.0 million
Dallas Public Library
4.7 million
University of Arizona
4.7 million
University of Virginia
4.7 million
Pennsylvania State University
4.5 million
Houston Public Library
4.4 million
Michigan State University
4.4 million
University of Oklahoma
4.2 million
University of Pittsburgh
4.2 million
University of Iowa
4.1 million
Northwestern University
4.1 million
New York University
3.9 million
Cleveland Public Library
3.9 million
Rutgers University
3.8 million
University of Kansas
3.8 million
University of Georgia
3.7 million
University of Southern California
3.6 million
University of Florida
3.6 million
Miami-Dade Public Library System
3.5 million
Arizona State University
3.5 million
St. Louis Public Library
3.5 million
Washington University, St. Louis
3.4 million
Buffalo & Erie County Public Library
3.4 million
Johns Hopkins University
3.4 million
Hawaii State Public Library System
3.3 million
Cuyahoga County Public Library
3.2 million
University of South Carolina
3.2 million
State University of New York, Buffalo
3.2 million
University of California, Davis
3.2 million
Minneapolis Public Library
3.1 million
University of Hawaii
3.1 million
Wayne State University
3.1 million
Louisiana State University
3.1 million
Detroit Public Library
3.1 million
Brown University
3.1 million
University of Rochester
3.1 million
Mid-Continent Public Library
3.0 million
University of Massachusetts
3.0 million
University of Connecticut
3.0 million
University of Missouri, Columbia
3.0 million
Milwaukee Public Library
3.0 million
North Carolina State University
2.9 million
Columbus Metropolitan Library
2.9 million
University of Colorado
2.9 million
Cleveland Public Library
2.9 million
University of Kentucky
2.9 million
University of Maryland
2.9 million
University of Utah
2.8 million
Syracuse University
2.8 million
University of Notre Dame
2.8 million
District of Columbia Public Library
2.8 million
Texas A&M University
2.7 million
Toledo-Lucas County Public Library
2.7 million
University of Cincinnati Libraries
2.7 million
University of California, San Diego
2.7 million
Enoch Pratt Free Library
2.6 million
Vanderbilt University
2.6 million
University of California, Santa Barbara
2.6 million
University of Nebraska, Lincoln
2.6 million
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2.6 million
Fairfax County Public Library
2.6 million
Emory University
2.6 million
Auburn University
2.6 million
Montgomery County Public Library
2.6 million
Brigham Young University
2.6 million
St. Louis County Library District
2.5 million
Temple University
2.5 million
Kent State University
2.5 million
Georgetown University
2.5 million
Source: American Library Association, 2002.

Profile of Arundhati Roy
In 1997 Indian novelist Arundhati Roy won the Booker Prize, Britain’s most prestigious literary award, for her first novel, The God of Small Things. Michael Dirda, a Pulitzer Prize-winning critic, interviewed Roy for this July 1998 Encarta Yearbook article.
Indian Novelist and Booker Prize Winner Arundhati Roy
By Michael Dirda
“Don't emphasize any of the syllables: Air-Un-Dah-Tee,” she says precisely in a lilting, musical voice, just faintly inflected with what must be an Indian accent. Author of The God of Small Things, the 1997 winner of the prestigious Booker Prize, Arundhati Roy is 38 years old but could pass for a college student. Slender and short, she typically wears a denim jacket and jeans and carries a knapsack. For readings she may put on a long skirt and white silk blouse, which sets off her black hair, luminous eyes, and dark good looks. At such times she could be Ammu or the grown-up Rahel, the beautiful mother and daughter heroines of her acclaimed first novel.
It has been quite a ride for Roy since her book was published in 1997. The God of Small Things became a bestseller in more than 25 countries, from India to Germany, from Portugal to the United States. Writing in the New Yorker, novelist and critic John Updike praised the novel as a stunning debut, while the New York Times called Roy's book “Faulknerian in its ambitious tackling of family and race and class, Dickensian in its sharp-eyed observation of society and character.” Despite such head-swelling plaudits, Roy seems quite unaffected by her achievement and good fortune. Compared to the great scope of history and time, she says, “I believe strongly in my insignificance.”
Human Drama
Like the best fiction, The God of Small Things—by turns a gothic mystery, social comedy, three-generation saga, and tragic love story—is, most of all, an intensely human drama. It is the tale of how the drowning of a little girl and the police murder of an illicit lover utterly destroy a well-to-do Indian family, especially two children, whose lives are emotionally blasted and withered.
But the novel is also a portrait of Kerala, the densely populated Indian state on the subcontinent's southern tip that has a Communist government. “I wanted,” says Roy, “to drive my stake in here [in Kerala]. I wanted to say that this is my place, that it deserves literature. It was very important to me that it be real, these stars, these leaves.” Most of the action takes place in 1969, a time of political and social ferment. “Kerala is a place where big religions meet and rub against each other: Hinduism, Christianity—and Marxism.” She smiles.
“The novel had its origins in the vision of a sky blue Plymouth with sun in its chrome tail fins and a sign on its roof advertising pickles stopped at a traffic-crossing while a political demonstration flowed around it,” she says with another smile. Roy's family did not own a Plymouth, but such events were surprisingly commonplace. “One of my classmates at school was asked what were the most popular festivals in Kerala, and he replied, ‘Strikes!’”
Intricate Structure
This improbable-seeming vision ultimately became the second chapter of a book as tightly fitting and interwoven as a piece of embroidery. Like the classic novel Ulysses (1922) by Irish writer James Joyce, which revolves around the developments of a single day, most of the action in The God of Small Things radiates out from the events of the 24 hours following that traffic delay. In fact, the reader learns virtually everything that happens in the novel within the first 25 or 30 pages but is drawn on, obsessively, to find out the why and how of the story's tragic events. How did the little girl Sophie Mol die? What exactly happened to the handyman Velutha? Why were the twins Rahel and her brother Estha separated at the age of seven?
“The structure of the book,” observes Roy, “is something I worked very hard on. To me the way a story reveals itself is as important as the story. One day, after working for two-and-a-half years, I did some drawings and the graphics made it all clear to me. There is mathematics in the novel's architecture. Everything takes place over a period of one day and once you fix that, you are free to roam.”
In fact, Roy deftly alternates between the melodramatic events of 1969 and the somber aftereffects that still haunt the surviving characters in 1992. That year Rahel returns to India, after many years in the United States, to her hometown of Ayemenem to visit her brother. He has withdrawn into himself, neither speaking nor acknowledging anyone's existence. The reader wonders what will become of these sad twins—one quiet, the other emotionally empty—as much as we wonder about what happened to them when they were children.
This type of broken-up chronology is found in some of the other popular Booker Prize winners of the 1990s, such as A. S. Byatt's Possession (1990) and Michael Ondaatje's The English Patient (1992). This style irritates some readers, particularly those looking for the more straightforward action of commercial fiction. But such disjointing allows Roy to zip backward and forward in time—to discuss traditional Indian dance or Uncle Chacko's adventures at Oxford University, to joke about the 82-year-old “Baby” Kochamma's fondness for TV personality Phil Donahue or show us a little boy's tearful separation from his beloved mother—and still keep building the tension toward the final wrenching chapters, scenes of sorrow, brutality, heartbreak and, finally, ecstatic lovemaking.
“The smallest things connect to the biggest things, every detail of childhood, even the light on water, connects to history and politics and geological time,” she notes. “In a way, I'm trying to write about everything.” And to keep everything on track, she adds, “You have to keep reassuring the reader that he or she is in good hands. That's why there are all those repetitions, echoes, and reminders.” One key phrase, “Things can change in a day,” continually rings like an alarm bell through these pages.
Vivid Language
Along with its depiction of Indian life and its free-floating structure, The God of Small Things is most remarkable for its style, in particular its similes. “It was raining when Rahel came back to Ayemenem. Slanting silver ropes slammed into loose earth, plowing it up like gunfire.” “Rahel drifted into marriage like a passenger drifts toward an unoccupied chair in an airport lounge.” Chacko “took a seat by the window and sat down with an elbow on the table and his face cupped in the palm of his hand, smiling around the empty cafe as though he was considering striking up a conversation with the furniture.” “Rahel was like an excited mosquito on a leash.”
There is at least one startling simile per page, but Roy claims she hardly noticed them while writing. “No, I thought my writing was quite straightforward and was surprised when people mentioned the style. That's just the way I see the world.” She pauses, and then goes on. “The book took four-and-a-half years to write. I would work on it five hours a day, consciously using every bit of myself.”
Why did it take so long? “I needed to live with the book—while I was writing it I felt completely alive. Even blessed. I'm not interested in (writing) a book that I finish in a week, because for me, if I finish it in a week, I probably wouldn't be able to live with it for more than a week. I needed to really know it. In some ways, it was a literary puzzle to solve. I didn't realize how many years it would take to get out of it. Sometimes I'd spend five months writing and the cow was still on the level crossing, and I'd say to myself, ‘You're going to be a very old lady when it's over.’ The book just had its own pace.”
She thinks for a moment. “Do you know about laying down a music track? It was like continuously adding more instruments, making it richer. A computer was quite necessary to me, just because there's so much going back and forth in time, thinking of different things. I'd tell myself that I should just take this thread and use it back there. I didn't even write the book in sequence. For instance, after I wrote about Pappachi's moth, with its ‘unusually dense, dorsal tufts,’ I used the same moth imagery to describe Rahel's worry about her mother's love.”
Comic Tone
Although the novel is often sorrowful in its events—the women fall in love with the wrong men, there is child abuse, death, anguish of every sort—its tone is surprisingly jaunty, sunlit, sometimes downright comic. Father Mulligan “was studying Hindu scriptures, in order to be able to denounce them intelligently.” Pappachi's “light-brown eyes were polite yet maleficent, as though he was making an effort to be civil to the photographer while plotting to murder his wife.” The wicked grand-aunt Baby Kochamma, now the proud inheritor of a house of decaying possessions, “was frightened by the BBC [British Broadcasting Company] famines and television wars that she encountered while she channel-surfed. Her old fears of the Revolution and the Marxist-Leninist menace had been rekindled by new television worries about the growing numbers of desperate and dispossessed people. She viewed ethnic cleansing, famine, and genocide as direct threats to her furniture.”
Roy is particularly good in evoking the childish world of the seven-year-old twins—their antsiness and mutual teasing, their Winnie-the-Pooh-like spelling of words (“the Bar Nowl”), their complete devotion to the doomed carpenter Velutha. In one paragraph she renders the childhood of Velutha, a member of Hinduism's lowest class, the Untouchables. The last detail is quite heartbreaking:
“It was Mammachi … who first noticed little Velutha's remarkable facility with his hands. Velutha was eleven then, about three years younger than Ammu. He was like a little magician. He could make intricate toys—tiny windmills, rattles, minute jewel boxes out of dried palm reed; he could carve boats out of tapioca stems and figurines on cashew nuts. He would bring them for Ammu, holding them out in his palm (as he had been taught) so she would not have to touch him to take them.”
The Proper Light Brigade
Even with a Booker Prize and glowing reviews, some readers have reservations about The God of Small Things. Opinions are surprisingly varied, some calling the book a masterpiece while others dismiss it as pretentious and artsy. Such critics point to Roy's gratuitous use of capitals (“The Love Laws,” “The History House”), broken-up words (“Lay Ter”), baby talk and rhyme (“Stoppited,” “a viable, die-able age”), as well as some extravagant descriptions as signs of over-writing. Do such comments bother her? Would she change anything in her novel now? “No,” she answers, “but it's not because I think my book is perfect. I used all my powers when I wrote it and I'm just not the sort of writer who goes back.” A pause. “Such criticism is really like saying ‘I don't like the shape of your gall bladder.’”
“There is a group in India I call the Proper Light Brigade. They complain whenever India isn't shown in the ‘proper light.’ If you write about Brahmans or kathakali dancers, you're writing for the West. If you mention The Sound of Music, you have betrayed traditional Indian culture. India is a country that lives in several centuries, and some of the centuries have not been all that pleased with my book. But I say replace ethnic purity and ‘authenticity’ with honesty.”
Background in Architecture, Film
Roy has long been something of a loner and a rebel. Like the character Ammu, Roy's own mother was divorced, a Syrian Christian, and subject to societal pressures. “It's hard,” admits Roy, “when your protector is, in some ways, more vulnerable than you are. It makes for a very adult child and”—she hesitates and almost grins—“a very childish adult.” Still, Mary Roy clearly instilled a strong sense of independence in her daughter. “I am an escapee,” says Roy, savoring the word. “Sometimes I think that I'm the only woman in India whose mother told her not to get married. Too many girls in my country are broken before they are grown.”
Instead, Roy moved out of the house when she reached 18, took a degree in architecture (her professors, she says, later told reporters that “she was never normal”), and lived a kind of footloose, hippie life. For a while she associated with a group she calls “the lunatic fringe.” “We made movies that no one wanted to see,” she says. Roy herself wrote two screenplays—In Which Annie Gives It Those Ones and Electric Moon. These, she explains, “were exercises in limitations. The first was about students in an architecture school, the other about the marketing of Asian culture to the West.” Her first marriage, to a man from Goa, did not last. She is now married to one-time movie director, but now environmentalist, Pradip Krishen. They met when he noticed this beautiful young woman riding her bicycle and asked her to be in his film.
Despite these various associations with what Indians sometimes call the talkies, Roy has been resisting offers to make a movie of The God of Small Things. “A work expands into every crevice of its medium. I don't want my characters to belong to an actor or director. I want them to belong to the reader.” True to her sense of easy-going independence, she remains uncertain about her future. “I'll never take an advance for a book and really have no idea what I'll be doing next. I'm not a bureaucrat with a typical day. If you were to visit my house in Kerala, you might find a bunch of us lying on the floor looking at the ceiling fan and murmuring, ‘The rest of the world is working.’ Being a writer is the closest thing to not having a profession.” Of course, Roy is now a millionaire, which helps make it easier to do whatever she wants.
Literary Sensation
Her path to fame and riches is in itself quite romantic and incredible. “After I'd finished the novel, I didn't know what to do with it. I thought it was just this idiosyncratic, obscure book.” A friend of a friend showed it to the English agent David Godwin. Godwin read half the manuscript and called Roy in Kerala, “Don't sign anything. I'm coming to India.” She replied, “You'd better read the second half. You might decide it sucks.”
Meanwhile, the novel was being shopped to other publishers, and Roy was deluged with calls. She felt increasingly confused and uncertain. Then Godwin showed up at her house and, in Roy's words, told her, “I had this flat brown package by someone named Arundhati Roy. I didn't know whether it was a man or a woman. But once I started reading, it was like a shot of heroin up my arm.” “Well,” says Roy, “I thought that anybody who feels that way about my book can represent me.” She quickly adds, with a laugh, “Not that I'm pro-heroin or anything.” Godwin got Roy an astounding $1.6-million advance for the book, the highest ever paid for an Indian novel.
And then came the Booker Prize, an honor about which Roy has her usual mixed emotions. “First you get short-listed and then you get treated like a horse. It's humiliating. People bet on you. It's also humiliating that you start to really want the prize. I had written this novel for myself and never thought about prizes. But then.… On the night the winner is announced you first have to eat, or rather pretend to eat, while these hot lights and cameras are pointed at you. And after you've won you're bustled from one BBC van to the next. It's really quite humiliating. But after a while,” she smiles, “things get better.”
Writing in English
When The God of Small Things came out in the United States, Roy was asked to provide a glossary or rework some of the Malayalam, the Indian state language she occasionally uses in the text. She refused. “‘Why,’ I asked myself, ‘should I be the only one who's working here?’” Although Roy speaks Malayalam and Hindi, English is her primary language. “It's the common language of India,” she says, a legacy of India's colonization by the British. “Parents know their children won't get a good job without it. I may dip into my other languages, but I couldn't write a story in them.”
Roy is the latest star in a constellation of great modern Indian writers, all of whom write entirely in English. Roy's style—exact, witty, verging on the magical (without being magical-realist)—recalls the esteemed Salman Rushdie in his epic novel The Moor's Last Sigh (1996). But she has an elegance and control that seem more classical than the sprawling fiction of many modern Indian writers. These include Rushdie, a world-class figure with myriad styles at his command; novelist G. V. Desani, who plays with language in an almost Joycean way; R. K. Narayan, a novelist whose gentle humor and subtle irony was admired by English writer Graham Greene; and novelist and poet Vikram Seth, who writes variously of Indian, American, and other societies and produced a gigantic, Victorian-style family saga in the acclaimed A Suitable Boy (1993).
Roy traces her own flair for prose back to early childhood—“writing is the only thing I ever wanted to do”—and to some favorite books and authors. She loves Joyce, English writers Rudyard Kipling (“how safe one felt in his hands”) and D. H. Lawrence, American F. Scott Fitzgerald, and Russian-American Vladimir Nabokov. “The opening of [Nabokov's] Lolita always gives me gooseflesh,” she relates. Reviewers have often compared her to William Faulkner, a powerful writer of the American South whom she's never read. “My publisher just bought me a copy of (Faulkner's 1929 classic) The Sound and the Fury. But I haven't started it yet.” In fact, she admits, “I'm not that much of a reader.” When people ask her for writing advice, she always tells them, “Never ask for advice.”
Inspired By Dance
A lot of her aesthetic sense, continues Roy, actually derives from watching kathakali dancers, who perform familiar Indian tales—the Great Stories—in the highly stylized dance-drama that is native to Kerala. The dancers can spend hours illustrating one second of action, she claims. “I used to ask myself, while watching them, ‘Why am I so mesmerized by this story I already know?’ That's why I tell so much in the opening pages of my book. You know almost everything in the first chapter.”
There is a paragraph in her novel about kathakali that sounds like a personal aesthetic statement. Roy nods at this. “Why don't I just read it?” She enunciates with a precise, musical voice, and savors each word as if it were a sip of wine:
“It didn't matter that the story had begun, because kathakali discovered long ago that the secret of the Great Stories is that they have no secrets. The Great Stories are the ones you have heard and want to hear again. The ones you can enter anywhere and inhabit comfortably. They don't deceive you with thrills and trick endings. They don't surprise you with the unforeseen. They are as familiar as the house you live in. Or the smell of your lover's skin. You know how they end, yet you listen as though you don't. In the way that although you know that one day you will die, you live as though you won't. In the Great Stories you know who lives, who dies, who finds love, who doesn't. And yet you want to know again. That is their mystery and their magic.”
Certainly, The God of Small Things possesses such mystery and magic. But what exactly does Roy mean by “the small things”? From one perspective, her novel reveals how seemingly inconsequential events can build to a terrible avalanche. If Estha hadn't gone into the lobby of the movie theater because he was singing along with The Sound of Music, he wouldn't have been sexually abused by the Orangedrink Lemondrink Man. If Rahel hadn't recognized Velutha in the Marxist parade, then Baby Kochamma might not have directed all her wrath at him. If Velutha hadn't stepped out of history and suddenly noticed that his childhood friend Ammu was a woman, their love affair might never have begun. But the small things did happen, and so the big things happened too.
In The God of Small Things, says Roy with finality, “I'm trying to understand the sources of happiness, the ordinary moments which we only recognize when they're snatched away. Moments of childhood wonder. The glint of light on water. Intimacy. The small things.… Yes, terrible things do happen, but within the sadness there is joy. A fit storyteller is one who can span this range from the sublime to the crude, from the tender to the ridiculous. You don't understand love unless you understand brutality. Fiction, you know, is a way of making sense of the world.”
About the author: Michael Dirda is a writer and editor for the Washington Post Book World. He received the 1993 Pulitzer Prize for criticism.
Further reading:
Cowley, Jason. “Goddess of Small Things.” The Times of London, October 18, 1997.
Hart, Jordana. “Arundhati Roy: A Forceful, Daring Debut.” Ms., November 1, 1997.
“India: Kerala Controversy Over the God of Small Things.” The Statesman, October 24, 1997.
Jaggi, Maya. “An Unsuitable Girl.” The Guardian, May 24, 1997.
Kaufman, Marc. “Small Things Seals India As Source of Great Writing.” Denver Post, August 10, 1997.
Kumar, Amitava. “The God of Small Things (book reviews).” The Nation, September 29, 1997.
Spaeth, Anthony. “No Small Thing.” Time International, April 14, 1997.
Updike, John. “Mother Tongues.” New Yorker, June 23, 1997.
Wood, James. “An Indelicate Balance: The Noisy Pluralism of Indian Fiction.” The New Republic, December 29, 1997.
Source: Encarta Yearbook, July 1998.

Literature Guides help you understand books studied in schools and give you insights that make for great book reports. Gain a new perspective by reading about the author, and learn how settings, characters, and themes help make these books acclaimed works of literature.
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone
Published 1997
I

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Born on July 31, 1965, in Gloucestershire, England, Joanne Kathleen Rowling grew up in rural communities in the southwestern part of that country. Her parents, Peter and Anne Rowling, an engineer and laboratory technician respectively, bought books such as The Wind in the Willows to read to their two daughters. Rowling’s childhood experiences shaped her future literary creations. She explored the English countryside, visiting castles and historical sites which inspired her imagination. Although she disliked science and mathematics courses, Rowling excelled in literature classes. She penned funny, fantastical tales to amuse her sister Diana and friends, especially the Potter siblings whose name she later appropriated for her wizardry novels.
As a teenager, Rowling dreamed of becoming a published author whose books were sold in stores. She kept her ambitions a secret, though, because she feared criticism and discouragement from people who might declare that her writing was weak. Rowling gradually became more self-confident and was named Head Girl during her final year at school. Studying languages at Exeter University in order to be employable as a bilingual secretary, Rowling graduated with a degree in French and Classics. This scholarly knowledge aided her later clever construction of characters in the Harry Potter books. She also earned college credits while serving as an auxiliary teacher in Paris.
Rowling researched human rights issues for Amnesty International, then relocated to Manchester for other office positions. She worked for a company that manufactured surveillance equipment. The self-professed disorganized Rowling loathed her secretarial duties, often writing instead of working. She wrote fiction for adult readers but did not submit it for publication. She also often visited her ailing mother, who had been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis a few years earlier. During one of these train trips, Rowling had an epiphany about an orphaned boy wizard named Harry Potter and began inventing characters and settings. After her mother’s death in 1990, Rowling decided to teach English as a second language in Oporto, Portugal.
She outlined seven books to chronicle Harry’s adventures at the Hogwarts School of Wizardry and Witchcraft and his battle against evil forces. Each book would feature one year of Harry’s schooling as he aged from eleven years old to seventeen. During the search for his identity as he matured, Harry would avenge his parents’ murder, discover his family’s heritage, and secure sanctuaries where good wizards and witches could thrive. Rowling’s careful planning enabled her to place subtle clues that would later prove crucial to characterization and plot development.
Writing in the mornings and teaching in the afternoon and at night, Rowling met and married journalist Jorge Arantes. Their daughter Jessica was born in August 1993. Several months later, Rowling divorced Arantes and moved with Jessica to Edinburgh, Scotland, where her sister Diana lived. Diana urged Rowling to finish the first Harry Potter novel. The media has emphasized that Rowling was on public assistance during this time, and Rowling clarifies that she was initially unable to find work that paid a sufficient salary for her to afford child care. Later, she began teaching in a local school.
Writing for her own entertainment and sense of accomplishment, Rowling did not intend to write a children’s book. Agent Christopher Little recognized Rowling’s talent and began submitting the book to publishers. Bloomsbury Press bought Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone in 1996. The next year, Scholastic Inc. purchased rights to publish the book in the United States, changing the title’s wording to attract American readers. Rowling received a grant from the Scottish Arts Council to complete her second book, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. She sold film and merchandising rights to Warner Brothers.
Rowling has received praise from reviewers and readers, winning numerous awards, including the Smarties Prize for her first three books, and topping the bestseller lists. She was named Author of the Year at the British Book Awards in 2000 and received an honorary doctorate from the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. Rowling has become a celebrity, appearing as a featured reader at such events as the White House Easter egg roll. The Harry Potter books are a catalyst for a cultural phenomenon. Millions of copies in more than thirty languages have been sold in over one hundred countries. Readers of all ages apprehensively wait for new books then voraciously read them. The dark themes explored in the series have caused some conservative groups to attempt to ban the books from classrooms. Rowling responds to such attacks by stating that she does not believe in witchcraft and thinks children deserve to know the realities of evil.
II

OVERVIEW
The first of the “Harry Potter” books, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone introduces readers to Harry Potter on the cusp of his eleventh birthday. Born to a well-respected and much-loved witch and wizard, Harry Potter was orphaned as a baby and left to be taken care of by his Aunt Petunia and Uncle Vernon Dursley, along with their son Dudley.
Harry bears the scars of his parents’ fate and his orphaned status both literally and figuratively. The evil wizard Voldemort (“He Who Shall Not Be Named”) killed Harry’s parents but could not vanquish their son. As a result of the battle, Harry wears a curious, lightning-shaped scar on his forehead—a scar that burns when Harry is in danger or when he wakes up from a repeating nightmare of infant memory. Nevertheless, being the son of a successful magic couple and defeating an evil wizard as a one-year-old babe is not without benefits. Harry Potter is renowned in the magic world, a child hero. But he is a child hero unaware. In their wisdom, Professors Dumbledore and McGonagall leave Harry on the Durlsey’s doorstep. The Dursleys are staunch and proud Muggles, non-magic people who live in a flat, gray, and oppressively over-systematized and inconvenient world—the world of present-day Great Britain.
Harry is perceived as a burden and potential embarrassment to the Dursleys. He is told that his parents were killed in a car accident, never shown any photographs of them, and kept ignorant of the magic world and his own possible place in it. Harry Potter cannot explain how he was able to jump on top of the school building when being chased by bullies, nor how he dissolved the glass front of a snake’s habitat and conversed with the boa constrictor during Dudley Dursley’s birthday outing to the zoo. Indeed, these are the very things that leave him friendless, isolated, and very unheroic in his own (and everyone else’s) eyes.
The first ten years of Harry’s life bear a resemblance to Wart’s, the young King Arthur’s, childhood as depicted in T. H. White’s The Once and Future King. Where White’s long-bearded Merlin gives the Wart in fosterage, in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, Rowling’s Professor Dumbledore farms Harry out to distant relatives. Where White’s young Arthur is treated as a second-class son compared to the up-and-coming Sir Kay, Rowling’s child hero is abused and maligned by his aunt and uncle and their spoiled, ridiculous son Dudley. Where White’s protagonist is unwittingly trained for kingship by Merlin before he stumbles across the sword in the stone and his heroic self, Rowling’s title character is eventually relieved of his unhappy Muggle upbringing by Professor Dumbledore’s letter of acceptance to Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Noble parentage and inherent heroism are revealed and Rowling’s Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone takes off into a description of the non-Muggle world, the wonderful landscape and lifestyle of Hogwarts school, and the first-year student adventures of Harry and his new friends, Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger. Together, they embark on a quest for the Sorcerer’s Stone, a magical stone that, as they discover, is hidden deep within Hogwarts.
III

SETTING
In some ways, Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry is a traditional English boarding school located in the fairy-green countryside well beyond London. The meddlesome caretaker, Mr. Filch, and his cat, Mrs. Norris, carefully monitor the building, and the grounds are well kept by the beloved Keeper of Keys and Grounds (and Hogwarts drop-out) Rubeus Hagrid. During the long-standing tradition of the Sorting Ceremony, first-year Hogwarts students are separated into four houses (Gryffindor, Hufflepuff, Ravenclaw, and Slytherin), each with their own proud history, alumni, and secret traditions. The faculty are respected scholars and authority figures removed from the emotional and interpersonal experiences of their students. The curriculum is carefully structured and deliberately traditional, and residents take classes by year and with students from other houses. Points are given and taken away for academic achievement, behavior and deportation, and athletic competition—all in an effort to win the much-coveted house cup at the end-of-year feast.
And yet, Hogwarts is a world all its own, a non-Muggle world. Students arrive by a train taken from platform nine and three-quarters at King’s Cross station. During the journey they snack on candies—Bertie Bott’s Every Flavor Beans (including “spinach and liver and tripe”), Cauldron Cakes, Licorice Wands, and Pumpkin Pasties—which they have bought with Sickles and Knuts (“[s]eventeen silver Sickles to a Galleon and twenty-nine Knuts to a Sickle”). They amuse themselves by trading cards of famous witches and wizards (Professor Dumbledore among them) from packages of Chocolate Frogs. The campus is located inside a moat and the building is a castle. The house dormitories are in the four round towers located at the corners of the building and accessed by secret passwords that open portrait holes. The Sorting Ceremony stars a Sorting Cap that reads the new students’ minds before assigning them to the appropriate house. Not only do the portraits have a frustrating tendency to visit other paintings in the castle, thereby foiling the adventures of many an erring student, Mr. Filch and Mrs. Norris are not the only “caretakers” to avoid. Peeves the poltergeist will insist on reporting students out of bed after hours, and the other ghosts (Nearly Headless Nick and the Bloody Baron among them) have loyalties to certain houses. The faculty members also have their allegiances—as well as curious (possibly threatening) involvements with the adult, magic world. Course work is difficult and requires much study, whether dry and boring like History of Magic with Professor Binns, “complex and dangerous” like Transfiguration with Professor McGonagall, or disappointingly uninformative like Defense Against the Dark Arts with Professor Quirrell. The sport of choice is Quidditch, a challenging game “that’s sort of like basketball on broomsticks with six hoops.”
The Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone is set in a comfortingly traditional and delightfully off-beat way—much like the apprentice magic world of the Hogwarts students as compared to the adult magic world for which they are preparing, or like the whole of the magic world as compared to the Muggle world. Accepted Hogwarts students walk through a wall in order to reach platform nine and three-quarters at King’s Cross station. Tapping a brick behind the Leaky Cauldron pub three times with your magic wand will open it to Diagon Alley, the shopping center of the magic world, home to Eeylops Owl Emporium, Ollivanders wand shop, and Gringotts, the wizard’s bank run by goblins. Diagon Alley is also the only place in London where a prospective student can get everything he or she needs, from the uniform (such as “[o]ne pair of protective gloves (dragon hide or similar)”) to course books (like “Magical Drafts and Potions by Arsenius Jigger”) and other equipment (“1 cauldron (pewter, standard size 2)”). The Ministry of Magic works to ensure that Muggles remain ignorant of the actuality of the magic world because “‘everyone’d be wantin’ magic solutions to their problems ... we’re best left alone’.” And the commonplace systems of the Muggle world amaze and confound witches and wizards. For example,
[p]assersby stared a lot ... as they walked through the little town to the station. Harry couldn’t blame them ... he kept pointing at perfectly ordinary things like parking meters and saying loudly, “See that Harry? Things these Muggles dream up, eh?”.
The layering of experiences and perspectives in Rowling’s text work to keep the reader both grounded and aware. As such, the reader enjoys a setting that has been wonderfully and completely imagined, described, and realized by Rowling in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone.
IV

THEMES AND CHARACTERS
Like the setting of the novel, Rowling’s themes and characters are both traditional and off-beat. British to the core, the themes and characters of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone contain a delightful blend of classic fantasy and Victorian sentiment minus the tendency towards what a contemporary audience might consider saccharine. Ideally—and at their best—both classic British fantasy and Victorian literature enjoy the great themes of love and death, of good and evil. This is true of Rowling’s Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, wherein the title character, our noble hero, having been orphaned and overshadowed by a cruel and ignorant world, continues to battle issues of class and conscience even after he is delivered to a better, more accepting and acceptable, place.
It is this better place, Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, and the magic world more generally, that inspires and insists Harry learn from his orphaned status—that he grow into his own great person rather than be beaten down for being different and for having fewer “normal” advantages. Understandably preoccupied as the orphan is with death, Harry’s hero’s adventure suitably involves the quest to find, to recover, and to restore the Sorcerer’s Stone by which the Elixir of Life can be manufactured and immortality achieved. It is a dangerous tool in the wrong hands, and Harry risks his own life in order to ensure the quality of the lives of others.
In the end, Harry Potter accepts and promotes what Professor Dumbledore, headmaster of Hogwarts and co-creator of the Sorcerer’s Stone, so eloquently explains: “to the well-organized mind, death is but the next great adventure.” With this acceptance comes additional emotional support. Harry’s parents are dead, yes, but this is more of a shift in fate than it is an irreparable loss. In her characteristic layering style, Rowling points out that not only have Harry’s parents left the gift of Harry behind, but they have left Harry with a gift. At the novel’s end, when Harry asks Professor Dumbledore why Quirrell, the evil wizard Voldemort’s accomplice, could not touch him, Dumbledore replies:
Your mother died to save you. If there’s one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love. He didn’t realize that love as powerful as your mother’s for you leaves its own mark. Not a scar, no visible sign ... to have been loved so deeply, even though the person who loved us is gone, will give us some protection forever. It is in your very skin.
Thus Harry is not only scarred literally and figuratively by his orphaned status, he is also, alternatively, positively marked by it. And this is something that we hope the young adult audience, the intended audience for Rowling’s Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, might learn to recognize as a theme in the real magic of their own lives.
It is the students of Hogwarts, the fictional contemporaries and peers of the intended audience, who demonstrate that these great themes—love and death, good and evil—are part and parcel of every life lived. Whether that student be the quintessential bully, as is Draco Malfoy (and his henchmen Crabbe and Goyle), or the overweight, clumsy, and somewhat untalented but nevertheless good-hearted Neville Longbottom, each individual’s psyche and personality is shaped by how they perceive and respond to the great themes in their own lives. In Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, Rowling’s characters are complex, dimensional, and interesting, because they perceive and respond to the signature notes of these themes in their own lives.
Indeed, the bully Draco Malfoy suffers from feelings of inferiority due, in part, to the success, expectations, and snobbery of his father. Neville Longbottom, raised by his grandmother and unpopular for the resulting lack of style this upbringing has caused, carries his own, similar yet distinct, sense of illegitimacy. Ron Weasley is one of seven children (including five boys ahead of him), all of whom have met with great success while studying at Hogwarts—be it as head boy, Quidditch captain, house prefect, or wildly popular pranksters. Hermione Granger negotiates the stress of being a Type-A overachiever from a Muggle family.
The adults of the magic world, too, are not above the struggle to commandeer their lives and worlds—a facet of Rowling’s fiction that may account for the literary success of the Harry Potter books in the real, adult world. Professor Snape struggles with the guilt and frustration of not being able to repay his arch-rival, Harry’s (now dead) father, for saving his life. Rubeus Hagrid has been shamed by being expelled from Hogwarts, by having had his wand broken in half and forbidden to use magic thereby leaving him an obvious misfit in the Muggle world as well as one marginalized within the non-Muggle world. Even the wise Professor Dumbledore, a near-perfect man and wizard, must come to terms with the foibles and disappointments that color the human experience. When asked what he sees in the Mirror of Erised—a bewitched mirror that not only bears the inscription, “Erised stra ehru oyt ube cafru oyt on wohsi” (I show not your face but your heart’s desire), but also reveals Harry’s family to him and shows Ron Weasley himself as head boy holding the Quidditch cup—Professor Dumbledore replies: “I? I see myself holding a pair of thick, woolen socks.... One can never have enough socks.... Another Christmas has come and gone and I didn’t get a single pair. People will insist on giving me books.” However tongue-in-cheek it may be, Professor Dumbledore’s remark nevertheless speaks a greater truth: in recognizing our great ability to want what we do not have, we just might stumble across an appreciation for what we have been given. It is, ultimately, a restatement of what our young protagonist has learned from the loss of his parents and one that benefits both Rowling’s characters and audience—young or old.
V

LITERARY QUALITIES
Whether because they offer a natural metaphor for coming-of-age audiences transitioning into the adult world, or because—either in cause or effect—they are generally considered most appropriate for the developmental phases and developing psyche of the young adult, the canonized classics of British fantasy traditionally feature young adult protagonists. “The Sword in the Stone,” Book One of T. H. White’s aforementioned The Once and Future King (1958), searches back through history, legend, and the author’s own boyhood, to expand the Arthurian legend by contributing the story of Arthur’s young adulthood. Appropriately, White, a teacher of young adults, expands Arthurian legend by describing what the young Wart learned in his lessons with Merlin in order to explain the genius of Wart’s later kingship.
But T. H. White is simply one of the more recent authors to artfully and respectfully redefine the traditional parameters of the fantasy genre. He follows such great masters as Lewis Carroll and C. S. Lewis and such beloved characters as Alice Liddell and Lucy Prevensie. In Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland (1866) and Through the Looking-Glass (1872), Carroll describes a series of experiences that mature Alice both emotionally and intellectually in order to prepare her for life as a logical, reasoning, and kind-hearted woman. In the seven books that make up C. S. Lewis’s The Chronicles of Narnia (1950-1956), Lucy and the Pevensie children (as well as Polly Plumber, Digory Kirke, Eustace Scrubb, and Jill Pole) accomplish a series of moral tasks that underscore Lewis’s and the novels’ Christian sentiment and earn the characters a place in heaven.
In accordance with, and in honor of, this proud literary history, Rowling’s Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone begins the story of Harry Potter, age eleven, apprentice wizard and self-doubting hero—a novel that, and a protagonist who, has been inspired by the motifs of classic British fantasy. Clearly, Rowling aspires to further define, and to excel within, the genre of fantasy. In her general examination of the young hero’s mentor and his acquisition of wisdom, Rowling’s Harry Potter resembles White’s young Arthur. Though not privately tutored by Hogwarts headmaster Professor Dumbledore, Harry nevertheless is trained within his school and according to his pedagogic system. And it is at crucial times in the narrative of his training that Harry is given the opportunity to consult with Dumbledore: when he develops a dangerous preoccupation with the Mirror of Erised, when he must negotiate the prudent use of the invisibility cloak, and after he has successfully (and for the second time) defeated “He Who Shall Not Be Named.” Additionally, Dumbledore resembles Merlin both personally and physically; he is an avid lover of books and wisdom who wears flowing robes and a long, white beard. This resemblance suggests not only how much White’s master wizard has influenced—and continues to influence—audience expectation, but how that influence has determined Rowling’s use of classic fantasy motifs.
Rowling also credits Lewis Carroll and C. S. Lewis through her description, and use, of a reflective device and a train ride to achieve passage into a fantastic other-world. In a manner that suggests a parallel to the rites of passage of young adulthood, Harry Potter boards a train at platform nine and three-quarters at King’s Cross station. Harry’s trip will bring him to the wondrously magical and separate (though whimsically and pointedly parallel) world of Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. After many railway trips, many happy adventures, and the conclusive suggestion that they might be outgrowing such adventures, the Pevensie children of Lewis’s The Chronicles of Narnia access the kingdom of heaven when they are killed in a train wreck. In Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass, Alice speeds through the countryside of her own parallel world, the reversed world of “nonsense” on the other side of a mirror, while she is engaged in a giant game of chess that she must win in order to return transformed and victorious to the “real,” that is adult, world. Harry passes the preparatory “test” of the Mirror of Erised (with a great deal of help and guidance from Professor Dumbledore), gaining the strength and confidence necessary to help him (along with Ron Weasley) face the challenge of the giant chess game towards the end of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. Alice’s success in the chess game, involving the maturity required to eschew the paradoxes (bureaucracy) of the Red Queen and her supporters (political, governmental systems), informs Rowling’s description of Harry’s and Ron’s actions during the giant Chess game, as well as our perceptions of them. Chess, a game of logic requiring patience and experience, tests and proves both the capabilities of reason and fantasy, and Harry and his friends must further establish themselves as heroes by exercising both of these capabilities—much in the way the audience does in the act of reading, in the act of entering a reflective art form.
Thus, as a fellow reader and creating author, in book one of the “Harry Potter” series, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, Rowling gives due credit to the precedents of her literary forebears and extends a hand to those writers who may hope to follow. And the readers and keepers of the tradition of classic, British fantasy, would do well to acknowledge agreement in Rowling’s debt as well as the reader’s debt to Rowling.
VI

SOCIAL SENSITIVITY
In a television interview aired in July of 2000—just prior to the release of the much-anticipated fourth Harry Potter book—eminent children’s and young adult literature critic and scholar Jack Zipes described Rowling’s fiction as formulaic and sexist. Because Zipes was not given the chance to fully support his thesis within the format of the televised sound bite, any response to his thesis must be based, in part, on conjecture. Nevertheless, that Rowling’s Harry Potter books should be described as formulaic is problematic. The “Harry Potter” books are, after all, a series, and, at least thus far, the action takes place during the academic year. Aside from some scattered highlights of Harry’s summer holidays, the plot of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone follows the unchanging rhythm of a highly structured educational calendar. While an academic year provides a useful template by which Rowling may structure her fiction, the description of such a template as formulaic seems unfair and a refusal to acknowledge just how reliant a young adult audience is on the academic calendar—or how useful it is to the plot structure of British fantasy. Indeed, Lewis Carroll’s Alice has her adventures while she is not engaged with her studies in both Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass, and throughout C. S. Lewis’s The Narnia Chronicles, his young protagonists travel to and from Narnia while on vacation from school.
In terms of Rowling’s potential sexism, it may be likewise argued that, as she follows and departs from a traditional academic structure in her novels, so too does Rowling follow and depart from traditional gender roles. Mrs. Dursley characterizes the standard housewife in the opening pages of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, while Mr. Dursley presents us with a mock-image of the bowler-capped British businessman. But it should be noted that Mrs. and Mr. Dursley are not beloved characters (certainly not characters after whom young readers would be inclined to model themselves), and that other characters do not always line up according to standard expectations of gender: Professor McGonagall is a witch and a teacher to be respected and admired, Madame Hooch coaches the (co-ed) Quidditch team, Hermione Granger is as capable of getting herself out (or in) trouble as Ron Weasley or Harry himself; Professor Dumbledore is a homebody, Professor Quirrell is a weak and fearful wizard, and Hagrid has undeniably strong mothering instincts. Ultimately, that some of Rowling’s characters inhabit traditional gender roles while others do not may be the best, and most elegant, argument against the enforcement of those roles.
And yet, the defense of Rowling’s fiction as formulaic or sexist does raise some interesting considerations regarding social concerns in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. Because the novel follows the British school year, there are few—if any—references to non-Christian faiths and practices. Thus, the witches and wizards at Hogwarts celebrate Christmas—even despite their supposedly pagan history. Harry is able to afford Hogwarts because of the large inheritance left to him by his parents, a detail that can serve to example a limited representation of economic stratification. Due to his last name and his red hair, we might assume that Ron Weasley is of Irish descent; such an assumption would then lead us to argue that the depiction Ron’s family, poor and well-populated, reveals a prejudice against Irish Catholics in Rowling, Great Britain, or both. Similarly, while several referenced characters represent other races and ethnicities (Lee Jordan, for example, is black), the main protagonists of the novel, the characters in whom readers are most invested, are white.
Considering the anxiety that contemporary audiences and critics have regarding the fair and equal representation of peoples in literature—and particularly in literature for children and young adults—these observations are both legitimate and unavoidable. But, too, readers must consider the transcendent possibilities of fantasy novels. If one of the benefits of fantasy is to remove the reader from an oppressive social reality, and thereby to offer a lens through which he or she might critique and resolve social injustices, critics cannot expect fantasy to perform the same instructional modeling as contemporary realism. This is not an excuse or a justification, and it is not because fantasy does not mirror and model life as does all literature (and all art). It is because, as a genre, fantasy behaves according to its own history, tradition, and purpose. Though it is appropriate to expect contemporary fantasy to fairly and accurately represent social diversity, a more appropriate concern for fantasy may be how well it models the readers’ ability to see themselves within their social system and how convincingly it argues for their deserved equality. That Rowling’s Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone does, indeed, reflect and address social diversity, and that Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone inspires both young and old readers to see their worlds in new and different ways (ways that may result in social activism and change), offers a strong argument for our acknowledgment of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone as fantastic literature worthy of a place in the canon.
VII

TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION
1. J. K. Rowling’s Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone introduces readers to all sorts of interesting magical objects (the Nimbus 2000, the remembrall, magic wands, mail-delivering owls, live chess sets, the invisibility cloak ... not to mention the sorcerer’s stone). If you could have and use any one of these objects, which object would it be and why? Can you tell a real story about something that happened to you once when that object might have come in handy? How might the story have gone differently if you had had that object?
2. In Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, readers find out many interesting things about the magic world, and many magic characters think some pretty funny things about Muggles. What if, instead of you visiting them at Hogwarts when you read a Harry Potter book, they were to visit you at school or read about you in a book? What would they see? What classes, teachers, traditions, or sporting events might they find curious? Why?
3. If you were assigned to one of the houses (Griffindor, Hufflepuff, Ravenclaw, and Slytherin) which one would it be? What about your next door neighbor, your teacher, or the principal? What about some of the characters in your favorite television shows? Why?
4. In the “Harry Potter” books, Harry has a scar on his forehead—and a story to go with it. What, if any, scars do you have and what is/are the stories behind them? If, like Harry, you had special powers because of the scar (and based on the story), what would they be?
VIII

IDEAS FOR REPORTS AND PAPERS
1. The Harry Potter books are set in England, but the author, J. K. Rowling, lives in Scotland. What has the relationship between England and Scotland been throughout history?
2. Before shopping at the stores on Diagon Alley, Harry and Hagrid take a short walk through London. Research the city of London and report on what Harry and Hagrid might have seen on their trip. Consider such tings as the demographic population of the city, the ethnic populations, principal businesses, historical sites, and architecture.
3. Research the London Underground and the British railway system (especially the King’s Cross railway station). Which came first, the Underground or the railway? What is the connection between the Underground and the railway? What routes do they follow? Can you find any maps and timetables using the Internet?
4. J. K. Rowling had been a school teacher and was a single mother when she started writing Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone in a neighborhood coffee house. Research the author in order to find out more about her. What kind of insights has she given in interviews? Are there any parallels between the author’s life and her text?
5. To date, there are three more “Harry Potter” books: Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, and Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. Read one (or more) of the other “Harry Potter” books and compare it/them to the first book, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone.
6. In Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, Harry learns many interesting facts and unusual stories about the game of Quidditch and its history. What sort of interesting facts and unusual stories might you find when learning about one of your favorite sports? What are the similarities and differences between Quidditch and the sport that you researched?
7. In Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, Hagrid is surprised by such Muggle inventions as the parking meter. Who invented the parking meter and why? What other Muggle inventions might readers take for granted?
8. Research the game of chess in order to explain (and to demonstrate to your class) the game played towards the end of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. Does Ron play well? How might the game have been played differently? Were there better moves that could have been made?
9. Research the logic puzzle that Hermione solves with the bottled potions in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. What kind of logic puzzle is it? Does it have a name? What other kinds of logic puzzles are there? What are their different purposes?
Contributed by: Evelyn M. Perry, Framingham State College
Source: Beacham’s Guide to Literature for Young Adults. Copyright by Gale Group, Inc. Reprinted by permission.



CHEERFUL INDIPENDENCE DAY

BE PROUD TO BE AN INDIAN

Library services

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA KANJIKODE

DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARY

LIBRARY SERVICES


ISSUE & RETURN

The first and most important activity of our library is from the angle of students is issue & return of books. Books are being provided to the students at regular intervals. Open system is being followed. This system encourages readers to read more and more books, as it provides a close relationship between the readers and the book.

CLASS ROOM LIBRARY

Apart from the main library class room library is also being maintained exclusively for the primary children. Class room libraries are under the direct control and supervision of the class Teacher.

RESERVATION OF LOAN

Members are allowed to make reservation for any book they heed. Members will be informed of the availability of the books when returned by the other member.

RENEWAL OF LOAN

The loan of a book may be further renewed for a period of fortnight on production of book if there is no request for the same.



BOOK REVIEW METHOD

Students are asked to write review for the books they read and borrowed from the library to ensure that they have read the books. The student who reads maximum number of books are given prizes which acts as incentive for the students encouraging them to read more books.

REFERENCE SERVICE

Providing reference service is the most important aspect of readers service and this service is being provided to the students regularly and a separate register is being maintained.


CURRENT AWARENESS SERVICE

This service is also provided to the members of the library through the display boards and information\ bulletin boards.

QUIZ PROGRAMME

To motivate reading habit among the children quiz programmes are being organized
Conducted several quiz programmes


FUTURE PLAN FOR THE EFFECTIVE READING HABIT

DEPARTMENT LIBRARY:

It is planned to extent the reader’s service effectively through department libraries.


NEWS PAPER AND PRESS CLIPPING SERVICE:

It is also planned that news papers are the most important source of lates information. It would be most appropriate if the relevant cuttings of write-ups, editorials letters, statements, new items events ets., organized in some logical order for future reference in the library.

photo

Profile

Name: S. Venugopal

Designation: Librarian

Organisation: Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan

School : Kendriya Vidyalaya Kanjikode

Profile

Name: S. Venugopal

Designation: Librarian

Organisation: Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan

School : Kendriya Vidyalaya Kanjikode